Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernández Rodríguez, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T12:25:35Z
dc.date.available2022-06-01T12:25:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierONIX_20220601_9788855182249_670
dc.identifier.issn2704-5919
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56485
dc.description.abstractThrough examples taken from comedies recently attributed to Lope de Vega, this article deals with certain problems that should be considered when studying or editing plays of doubtful authorship. The analysis focuses on methods traditionally used to resolve problematic attributions, such as the study of versification, orthoepy and syllable counting. The conclusion argues that all of these tools —as well as the landmark works by Morley and Bruerton or W. Poesse — still offer great surprises and challenges for researchers. Thus, the development of new methods, such as stylometry, should not impel us to dismiss the classic approaches. Quite the opposite: old and new methods inform one another.
dc.languageSpanish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.subject.othercritical edition
dc.subject.otherattribution problems
dc.subject.othermeter
dc.subject.otherorthoepy
dc.subject.otherLope de Vega
dc.titleChapter Edición crítica, problemas textuales y de autoría: métrica y ortología en Lope de Vega
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-224-9.02
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9788855182249
oapen.series.number218
oapen.pages26
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record