Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeavey, Nina Gilden
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T12:55:49Z
dc.date.available2024-08-12T12:55:49Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/92651
dc.description.abstractThis chapter introduces the idea of a postformalist aesthetic theory of reconstructing remote artefacts aesthetic statuses. The case is immune to the misgivings about aesthetic enquiry prevalent in the humanities and social sciences, since it does not assume that recovering such statuses involves experiencing the artefacts potential to provide an intrinsically rewarding gratification of the senses, of the intellect, or of both together. Postformalist aesthetics sees itself as part of a broad investigation into the nature of evaluative attitudes towards visually conspicuous artefacts. Such a broad investigation represents a necessary step towards establishing whether an object was meant to merit aesthetic attention.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DN Biography and non-fiction prose::DNB Biography: general::DNBH Biography: historical, political and militaryen_US
dc.subject.otherJames Earl Ray; Martin Luther King Jr.; J. Edgar Hoover; Assassination; COINTELPROen_US
dc.titleChapter 5 True Conspiraciesen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Legacy of J. Edgar Hoover, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and James Earl Rayen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003459255-6en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook22f11c87-910c-40aa-8b85-d85c783922e3en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781032604626en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781003459255en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages20en_US
oapen.remark.publicFunder name: Washington University
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record