Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrampton, Sally
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-02 09:47:08
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T12:21:38Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T12:21:38Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier1001595
dc.identifierOCN: 1076743798en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28366
dc.description.abstractOvariotomy provides a useful way of unpacking not just the process of surgical innovation but also the usefulness of innovation as an analytical category in the history of medicine. How might we pin down the meaning of “innovation”—let alone “alternative innovation”—in surgery when these innovations themselves are unstable, changing entities that are difficult to define? Through the example of ovariotomy I show that alternative innovation need not necessarily imply competition between diverse innovations, but that such a framework might also be used to consider how different versions of the “same” operation arise.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRochester Studies in Medical History
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing::MN Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.otherOvarian surgery
dc.subject.othernineteenth century
dc.titleChapter 3 Defining Difference
dc.title.alternativeCompeting Forms of Ovarian Surgery in the Nineteenth Century
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec59728-955a-4262-a446-e1a2e1f2c8e1
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookdf37455b-b27e-4aea-9db0-eb7f53acd0c1
oapen.relation.isFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
oapen.collectionWellcome
oapen.pages20
oapen.place.publicationRochester
oapen.grant.number063019
oapen.remark.public3-8-2020 - No DOI registered in CrossRef for ISBN 9781580465946
oapen.identifier.ocn1076743798


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record