Understanding Perspectivism
Proposal review
Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects
dc.contributor.editor | Massimi, Michela | |
dc.contributor.editor | McCoy, Casey D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-02T12:21:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-02T12:21:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20250502_9781351383400_14 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/101274 | |
dc.description.abstract | This edited collection is the first of its kind to explore the view called perspectivism in philosophy of science. The book brings together an array of essays that reflect on the methodological promises and scientific challenges of perspectivism in a variety of fields such as physics, biology, cognitive neuroscience, and cancer research, just as a few examples. What are the advantages of using a plurality of perspectives in a given scientific field and for interdisciplinary research? Can different perspectives be integrated? What is the relation between perspectivism, pluralism, and pragmatism? These ten new essays by top scholars in the field offer a polyphonic journey towards understanding the view called ‘perspectivism’ and its relevance to science. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Science | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PD Science: general issues::PDA Philosophy of science | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PD Science: general issues::PDX History of science | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PB Mathematics::PBB Philosophy of mathematics | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTL Philosophy: logic | |
dc.subject.other | Cancer Stem Cells | |
dc.subject.other | Multiple Perspectival Models | |
dc.subject.other | Michela Massimi | |
dc.subject.other | Ordinary Differential Equations | |
dc.subject.other | C.D. McCoy | |
dc.subject.other | Multiple Alternative Models | |
dc.subject.other | Paul Teller | |
dc.subject.other | Agent Based Computer Simulations | |
dc.subject.other | Juha Saatsi | |
dc.subject.other | Single Cancer Type | |
dc.subject.other | Melinda Fagan | |
dc.subject.other | NSG Mouse | |
dc.subject.other | Johanna E. Wolff | |
dc.subject.other | Stathis Psillos | |
dc.subject.other | Spinal Cord | |
dc.subject.other | Theodore Arabatzis | |
dc.subject.other | Chaperone Interactions | |
dc.subject.other | Hasok Chang | |
dc.subject.other | Traditional Scientific Realism | |
dc.subject.other | Margaret Morrison | |
dc.subject.other | CSC Theory | |
dc.subject.other | David Danks | |
dc.subject.other | Inconsistent Models | |
dc.subject.other | Mazviita Chirimutta | |
dc.subject.other | Universality Classes | |
dc.subject.other | Anya Plutynski | |
dc.title | Understanding Perspectivism | |
dc.title.alternative | Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781315145198 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781351383400 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781315145198 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781351383394 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781138503069 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781032092188 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781351383387 | |
oapen.imprint | Routledge | |
oapen.pages | 210 | |
oapen.place.publication | Oxford | |
oapen.identifier.ocn | 1135853722 | |
peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |