Japan's China Policy
Proposal review
A Relational Power Analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Hagström, Linus | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-19T07:28:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-19T07:28:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20250519T091213_9781134278718_9 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/102071 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Japan's China Policy understands Japan's foreign policy in terms of power - one of the most central concepts of political analysis. It contributes a fresh understanding to the subject by developing relational power as an analytical framework and by applying it to significant issues in Japan's China policy: the negotiations for a bilateral investment protection treaty and the disputed Pinnacle (Senkaku/Diaoyu) Islands. Hagström demonstrates that Japan exerted power over China in such divergent empirical settings for the most part by using civilian instruments positively, defensively and through non-action. Given that Japan's foreign policy is often portrayed rather enigmatically in terms of power, the unique contribution of Japan's China Policy is to demonstrate how to analyze power aspects of Japan's foreign policy in a more coherent fashion. This revealing approach to Japan's foreign policy will be of huge interest to anyone studying Japanese politics, foreign policy or international relations. | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | European Institute of Japanese Studies East Asian Economics and Business Series | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPS International relations | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::G Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary subjects::GT Interdisciplinary studies::GTM Regional / International studies | |
| dc.subject.other | relational | |
| dc.subject.other | power | |
| dc.subject.other | analysis | |
| dc.subject.other | pinnacle | |
| dc.subject.other | islands | |
| dc.subject.other | japans | |
| dc.subject.other | foreign | |
| dc.subject.other | japanese | |
| dc.subject.other | chinese | |
| dc.subject.other | relations | |
| dc.subject.other | Japan's China Policy | |
| dc.subject.other | Relational Power Analysis | |
| dc.subject.other | Pinnacle Islands | |
| dc.subject.other | Japanese Chinese Relations | |
| dc.subject.other | Japanese Policy Makers | |
| dc.subject.other | Japan’s Foreign Policy | |
| dc.subject.other | Japanese Statecraft | |
| dc.subject.other | Chinese Government | |
| dc.subject.other | Japanese Foreign Policy | |
| dc.subject.other | Asian Affairs Bureau | |
| dc.subject.other | Vice Versa | |
| dc.subject.other | Imperial Visit | |
| dc.subject.other | Treaties Bureau | |
| dc.subject.other | PRC Interest | |
| dc.subject.other | MITI Negotiator | |
| dc.subject.other | post-Cold War Foreign Policy | |
| dc.subject.other | Japanese Chinese Relationship | |
| dc.subject.other | LDP Politician | |
| dc.subject.other | Van Wolferen | |
| dc.subject.other | Foreign Policy Analysis | |
| dc.title | Japan's China Policy | |
| dc.title.alternative | A Relational Power Analysis | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9780203023792 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9781134278718 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780203023792 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9781134278701 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780415346795 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9781134278664 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780415438995 | |
| oapen.imprint | Routledge | |
| oapen.pages | 256 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Oxford | |
| oapen.identifier.ocn | 1202544127 | |
| peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
| oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |

