Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorRubio, Juan José Álvarez
dc.contributor.editorYiannibas, Katerina
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-21T14:54:02Z
dc.date.available2025-05-21T14:54:02Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierONIX_20250521T155841_9781351979153_14
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/102228
dc.description.abstractThe capacity to abuse, or in general affect the enjoyment of human, labour and environmental rights has risen with the increased social and economic power that multinational companies wield in the global economy. At the same time, it appears that it is difficult to regulate the activities of multinational companies in such a way that they conform to international human, labour and environmental rights standards. This has partially to do with the organization of companies into groups of separate legal persons, incorporated in different states, as well as with the complexity of the corporate supply chain. Absent a business and human rights treaty, a more coherent legal and policy approach is required. Faced with the challenge of how to effectively access the right to remedy in the European Union for human rights abuses committed by EU companies in non-EU states, a diverse research consortium of academic and legal institutions was formed. The consortium, coordinated by the Globernance Institute for Democratic Governance, became the recipient of a 2013 Civil Justice Action Grant from the European Commission Directorate General for Justice. A mandate was thus issued for research, training and dissemination so as to bring visibility to the challenge posed and moreover, to provide some solutions for the removal of barriers to judicial and non-judicial remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuses in non-EU states. The project commenced in September 2014 and over the course of two years the consortium conducted research along four specific lines in parallel with various training sessions across EU Member States. The research conducted focused primarily on judicial remedies, both jurisdictional barriers and applicable law barriers; non-judicial remedies, both to company-based grievance. The results of this research endeavour make up the content of this report whose aim is to provide a scholarly foundation for policy proposals by identifying specific challenges relevant to access to justice in the European Union and to provide recommendations on how to remove legal and practical barriers so as to provide access to remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuses in non-EU states.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBR Public international law: human rights
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAQ Law and society, sociology of law
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNC Company, commercial and competition law: general::LNCD Company law
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPS International relations::JPSN International institutions
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Management::KJ Business and Management::KJS Sales and marketing
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPV Political control and freedoms::JPVH Human rights, civil rights
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTS Social and political philosophy
dc.subject.otherHuman Rights
dc.subject.otherGuiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
dc.subject.otherRome Ii Regulation
dc.subject.othercorporate responsibility for human rights abuses
dc.subject.otherGuiding Principles
dc.subject.otherright of victims to an effective remedy
dc.subject.otherOverriding Mandatory Provisions
dc.subject.otherEU and Member States
dc.subject.otherEU Member State
dc.subject.otherbusiness-related human rights abuses
dc.subject.otherCorporate Human Rights Abuses
dc.subject.otherInternational Law
dc.subject.otherPublic International Law
dc.subject.otherNon-judicial Remedies
dc.subject.otherEU Member
dc.subject.otherPrivate International Law
dc.subject.otherATS
dc.subject.otherRome Ii
dc.subject.otherIG Metall
dc.subject.otherTort Law
dc.subject.otherForeign Direct Liability
dc.subject.otherHRDD
dc.titleHuman Rights in Business
dc.title.alternativeRemoval of Barriers to Access to Justice in the European Union
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781315269467
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb
oapen.relation.isbn9781351979153
oapen.relation.isbn9781351979139
oapen.relation.isbn9780367025168
oapen.relation.isbn9781351979146
oapen.relation.isbn9781138284180
oapen.relation.isbn9781315269467
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages158
oapen.place.publicationOxford
oapen.identifier.ocn1000432185
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record