Human Rights in Business
Proposal review
Removal of Barriers to Access to Justice in the European Union
dc.contributor.editor | Rubio, Juan José Álvarez | |
dc.contributor.editor | Yiannibas, Katerina | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-21T14:54:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-21T14:54:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20250521T155841_9781351979153_14 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/102228 | |
dc.description.abstract | The capacity to abuse, or in general affect the enjoyment of human, labour and environmental rights has risen with the increased social and economic power that multinational companies wield in the global economy. At the same time, it appears that it is difficult to regulate the activities of multinational companies in such a way that they conform to international human, labour and environmental rights standards. This has partially to do with the organization of companies into groups of separate legal persons, incorporated in different states, as well as with the complexity of the corporate supply chain. Absent a business and human rights treaty, a more coherent legal and policy approach is required. Faced with the challenge of how to effectively access the right to remedy in the European Union for human rights abuses committed by EU companies in non-EU states, a diverse research consortium of academic and legal institutions was formed. The consortium, coordinated by the Globernance Institute for Democratic Governance, became the recipient of a 2013 Civil Justice Action Grant from the European Commission Directorate General for Justice. A mandate was thus issued for research, training and dissemination so as to bring visibility to the challenge posed and moreover, to provide some solutions for the removal of barriers to judicial and non-judicial remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuses in non-EU states. The project commenced in September 2014 and over the course of two years the consortium conducted research along four specific lines in parallel with various training sessions across EU Member States. The research conducted focused primarily on judicial remedies, both jurisdictional barriers and applicable law barriers; non-judicial remedies, both to company-based grievance. The results of this research endeavour make up the content of this report whose aim is to provide a scholarly foundation for policy proposals by identifying specific challenges relevant to access to justice in the European Union and to provide recommendations on how to remove legal and practical barriers so as to provide access to remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuses in non-EU states. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBR Public international law: human rights | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAQ Law and society, sociology of law | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNC Company, commercial and competition law: general::LNCD Company law | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPS International relations::JPSN International institutions | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Management::KJ Business and Management::KJS Sales and marketing | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPV Political control and freedoms::JPVH Human rights, civil rights | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTS Social and political philosophy | |
dc.subject.other | Human Rights | |
dc.subject.other | Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights | |
dc.subject.other | Rome Ii Regulation | |
dc.subject.other | corporate responsibility for human rights abuses | |
dc.subject.other | Guiding Principles | |
dc.subject.other | right of victims to an effective remedy | |
dc.subject.other | Overriding Mandatory Provisions | |
dc.subject.other | EU and Member States | |
dc.subject.other | EU Member State | |
dc.subject.other | business-related human rights abuses | |
dc.subject.other | Corporate Human Rights Abuses | |
dc.subject.other | International Law | |
dc.subject.other | Public International Law | |
dc.subject.other | Non-judicial Remedies | |
dc.subject.other | EU Member | |
dc.subject.other | Private International Law | |
dc.subject.other | ATS | |
dc.subject.other | Rome Ii | |
dc.subject.other | IG Metall | |
dc.subject.other | Tort Law | |
dc.subject.other | Foreign Direct Liability | |
dc.subject.other | HRDD | |
dc.title | Human Rights in Business | |
dc.title.alternative | Removal of Barriers to Access to Justice in the European Union | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781315269467 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781351979153 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781351979139 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780367025168 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781351979146 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781138284180 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781315269467 | |
oapen.imprint | Routledge | |
oapen.pages | 158 | |
oapen.place.publication | Oxford | |
oapen.identifier.ocn | 1000432185 | |
peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |