Researching Ageing
Proposal review
Methodological Challenges and their Empirical Background
dc.contributor.editor | Łuszczyńska, Maria | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-30T06:44:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-30T06:44:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20250530T083217_9781000080186_60 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/103107 | |
dc.description.abstract | This book explores the diversity of methodological approaches to researching ageing, considering which methodological paradigm best captures the phenomenon. Interdisciplinary in scope, it brings together research from scholars from Austria, Canada, France, Hong Kong, Israel, Poland, UK and USA to uncover the conditions under which qualitative and quantitative approaches to research on ageing can best be reconciled and rendered complementary. Presenting international reflection on methods for studying old age from a variety of research backgrounds, Researching Ageing showcases the latest research in the field and will appeal to scholars across the social sciences, including sociology, demography, psychology, economics and geography, with interests in gerontology, ageing and later life. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Routledge Advances in Research Methods | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing::MB Medicine: general issues::MBN Public health and preventive medicine::MBNH Personal and public health / health education | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::G Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary subjects::GP Research and information: general::GPS Research methods: general | |
dc.subject.other | Therapeutic Patient Education | |
dc.subject.other | aging | |
dc.subject.other | COM-B Model | |
dc.subject.other | research | |
dc.subject.other | Univariate Latent Growth Curve Model | |
dc.subject.other | ageing | |
dc.subject.other | GMM Model | |
dc.subject.other | social science | |
dc.subject.other | CMO Configuration | |
dc.subject.other | research methods | |
dc.subject.other | COSMIN | |
dc.subject.other | methodology | |
dc.subject.other | Growth Mixture Model | |
dc.subject.other | quantitative approaches | |
dc.subject.other | Cross-national Qualitative Research | |
dc.subject.other | qualitative approaches | |
dc.subject.other | Longitudinal Statistical Models | |
dc.subject.other | reconciled | |
dc.subject.other | Current Scoping Review | |
dc.subject.other | Mixed Research Approaches | |
dc.subject.other | reflection | |
dc.subject.other | Latent Growth Curve Model | |
dc.subject.other | Hong Kong | |
dc.subject.other | COM-B | |
dc.subject.other | France | |
dc.subject.other | NTA | |
dc.subject.other | Poland | |
dc.subject.other | Peer Researchers | |
dc.subject.other | Austria | |
dc.subject.other | Quantitative Research | |
dc.title | Researching Ageing | |
dc.title.alternative | Methodological Challenges and their Empirical Background | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781003051169 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781000080186 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781000080247 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781000080216 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780367507572 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781003051169 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780367507558 | |
oapen.imprint | Routledge | |
oapen.pages | 368 | |
oapen.place.publication | Oxford | |
oapen.identifier.ocn | 1142951064 | |
peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |