Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGantet, Claire
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-01T15:52:30Z
dc.date.available2025-08-01T15:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifierONIX_20250801T173835_9791221505733_200
dc.identifier.issn3035-5923
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/104750
dc.description.abstractDespite the review ethos introduced by the physician Albrecht von Haller when he took over the Göttingische gelehrte Nachrichten as chief editor in 1747, he wrote many self-reviews. This article examines von Haller’s numerous self-reviews in order to explore the aims of reviewing, the openness of scholarship, the relationship between reviewing and truth, and the scientific language used, which can be summarised as what Marco Sgarbi, in a stimulating article, has called a “style of reasoning.” Reviews and self-reviews did not develop as an autonomous genre, but were integrated into a system of intermediality in which publications, reviews, (semi-)private letters and images responded to one another. They were primarily aimed at correcting and advancing science in the complexity of his intellectual, personal and cultural options.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKnowledge and its Histories
dc.subject.otherAlbrecht von Haller
dc.subject.otherstyle of reasoning
dc.subject.otherscholarly journals
dc.subject.otherreviews
dc.subject.otherscientific illustration
dc.subject.otheranatomy
dc.titleChapter Albrecht von Haller’s Self-Reviews and Style of Reasoning
dc.typechapter*
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0573-3.03
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9791221505733
oapen.series.number3
oapen.pages24
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record