Los Angeles and the Summer Olympic Games
Planning Legacies
Abstract
This open access book describes the three planning approaches and legacy impacts for the Olympic Games in one locale: the city of Los Angeles, USA. The author critically compares the similarities and differences of the LA Olympics by reviewing the 1932 and 1984 Olympics and by analyzing the concurrent planning process for the 2028 Olympics. The author unravels the conditions that make (or do not make) LA28’s argument “we have staged the Games before, we can do it again” compelling. Setting the bid’s promises into the contemporary local and global mega-event contexts, the author analyzes why LA won the bids, how those wins allowed LA to negotiate concessions with the IOC and NOC, and how legacies were planned, executed, and ultimately evolved. The author concludes with a prediction which 2028 legacy promises might and might not be fulfilled given the local and international Olympic contexts.
Keywords
Geography; Urban geography; Sports—Sociological aspects; Economic geography; Municipal governmentDOI
10.1007/978-3-030-38553-8Publisher
Springer NaturePublisher website
https://www.springernature.com/gp/products/booksPublication date and place
Cham, 2020Series
SpringerBriefs in Geography,Classification
Sociology: sport and leisure
Regional, state and other local government
Economic geography
Urban and municipal planning and policy