Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorBharadwaj, Ashish
dc.contributor.editorDevaiah, Vishwas H.
dc.contributor.editorGupta, Indranath
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-18 13:36:15
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T09:07:26Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T09:07:26Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier1006957
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23196
dc.description.abstractThis open access edited book captures the complexities and conflicts arising at the interface of intellectual property rights (IPR) and competition law. To do so, it discusses four specific themes: (a) policies governing functioning of standard setting organizations (SSOs), transparency and incentivising future innovation; (b) issue of royalties for standard essential patents (SEPs) and related disputes; (c) due process principles, procedural fairness and best practices in competition law; and (d) coherence of patent policies and consonance with competition law to support innovation in new technologies. Many countries have formulated policies and re-oriented their economies to foster technological innovation as it is seen as a major source of economic growth. At the same time, there have been tensions between patent laws and competition laws, despite the fact that both are intended to enhance consumer welfare. In this regard, licensing of SEPs has been debated extensively, although in most instances, innovators and implementers successfully negotiate licensing of SEPs. However, there have been instances where disagreements on royalty base and royalty rates, terms of licensing, bundling of patents in licenses, pooling of licenses have arisen, and this has resulted in a surge of litigation in various jurisdictions and also drawn the attention of competition/anti-trust regulators. Further, a lingering lack of consensus among scholars, industry experts and regulators regarding solutions and techniques that are apposite in these matters across jurisdictions has added to the confusion. This book looks at the processes adopted by the competition/anti-trust regulators to apply the principles of due process and procedural fairness in investigating abuse of dominance cases against innovators.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Management::KJ Business and Management::KJM Management and management techniques::KJMV Management of specific areas::KJMV6 Research and development managementen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International lawen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBM Public international law: economic and tradeen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNJ Entertainment and media lawen_US
dc.subject.otherLaw
dc.subject.otherMass media
dc.subject.otherLaw
dc.subject.otherPrivate international law
dc.subject.otherConflict of laws
dc.subject.otherLaw and economics
dc.subject.otherEconomic policy
dc.subject.otherManagement
dc.subject.otherIndustrial management
dc.titleMulti-dimensional Approaches Towards New Technology
dc.title.alternativeInsights on Innovation, Patents and Competition
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-13-1232-8
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy6c6992af-b843-4f46-859c-f6e9998e40d5
oapen.pages337
oapen.place.publicationSingapore


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record