Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilde , Truus de
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14 11:07:13
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T09:15:27Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T09:15:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier1006700
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23451
dc.description.abstractThe study scrutinizes the effects of language awareness on teachers’ conceptualization of language variation. Teacher language awareness has been discussed mostly for the case of English and with regard to grammar, and is defined as being determined by knowledge and reflexion (Andrews 2008, Svalberg 2012). This study aims at examining the reach of the concept for other languages, here Dutch, and for other terrains, in this case, language variation, thus stretching the application also into the realm of language ideology. According to Kroskrity (2006, 2016), language ideologies are (1) not knowledge but ‘‘notions’, ‘beliefs’ or ‘ideas’, which (2) are about language, the role(s) of language and its nature, and which (3) are constructed by individuals and groups in interaction with each other to (4) rationalize and justify social relations. In this linguistic-ethnographic study, a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with teachers of Dutch at eight European universities shows that knowledge and reflection play a considerable role for how teachers conceptualize language variation in class. Overall, four different types of teacher language awareness came to the fore, based on different interplays of both knowledge and reflection: standard language ideology alive, strong focus on prescription, doubting and linguistic insecurity and dynamic equilibrium. The overall results show the importance of teacher language awareness in language classes and help to boil down the vague notion of language awareness on language variation to two major defining factors, namely knowledge and reflection. Further, the study shows that language classrooms may be seen as ‘ideological sites’ (Silverstein (1979, 1998)), in which language ideology may be either reproduced or deconstructed, depending on the language awareness of the teacher. The consequences of the study for language teacher education are a plea for an informed, reflected, differentiated and integrative treatment of language variation in language class.
dc.languageDutch; Flemish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLage Landen Studies
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::2 Language qualifiers::2A Indo-European languages::2AC Germanic and Scandinavian languages::2ACD Dutchen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::2 Language qualifiers::2A Indo-European languages::2AC Germanic and Scandinavian languages::2ACF Flemishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFB Sociolinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CJ Language teaching and learning::CJC Language learning: specific skillsen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNM Higher education, tertiary educationen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNT Teaching skills and techniquesen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNU Teaching of a specific subjecten_US
dc.subject.otherEducation
dc.subject.otherHigher education
dc.subject.otherlanguage
dc.subject.otherForeign language
dc.subject.otherDutch
dc.subject.otherSociolinguistics
dc.subject.otherteaching
dc.subject.otherLanguage ideology
dc.titleOver taalbewustzijn en taalvariatie
dc.title.alternativeTaalideologie bij docenten Nederlands aan Europese universiteiten
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageTaalvariatie stelt docenten voor een bijzondere uitdaging: de vraag naar wat (nog net) kan en naar wat fout is. Die vraag is vaak niet zo makkelijk te beantwoorden. Hoe taaldocenten omgaan met taalvariatie, staat in deze sociolinguïstische studie centraal. Met een etnografische methode slaagt Truus De Wilde erin te achterhalen hoe docenten reageren op taalvariatie en analyseert ze achterliggende motieven. Taalideologieën over wat een standaardtaal is en zou moeten zijn, liggen aan de basis van deze analyse. Op basis van deze ideologieën worden vier archetypes geconstrueerd. De vele citaten uit interviews illustreren de archetypes en wijzen op de centrale rol van taalbewustzijn.
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy76cb5309-2a30-44e7-bc8c-7892cd1fa38c
oapen.relation.isFundedBy315619dc-aab0-48ba-938b-4ac10c3cc589
oapen.series.number12
oapen.pages220
oapen.place.publicationGent
oapen.grant.acronymInternationale Vereniging voor Neerlandistiek
oapen.remark.public21-7-2020 - No DOI registered in CrossRef for ISBN 9789401462440


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record