Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEnfield, N. J.
dc.contributor.editorMüller, Cornelia
dc.contributor.editorFricke, Ellen
dc.contributor.editorCienki, Alan
dc.contributor.editorMcNeill, David
dc.contributor.editorLadewig, Silva
dc.contributor.editorTessendorf, Sedinha
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-07 16:47:06
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T09:28:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-15 23:55
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-07 16:47:06
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T09:28:29Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T09:28:29Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier1006376
dc.identifierOCN: 1135847417en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23766
dc.description.abstractThis chapter argues for a composite utterances approach to research on body, language, and communication. It argues that to understand meaning we need to begin with the utterance or speech act as the unit of analysis. From this perspective, the primary task in interpreting others’ behaviour in communication is to infer what a person wants to say. In order to solve this task, an interpreter is free to consult any and all available information, regardless of the sensory modality in which that information is gathered (e.g., vision versus hearing), and regardless of the semiotic function of that information (e.g., iconic/indexical, symbolic/conventional, or some combination of these). Having recognized that another person has an intention to communicate, an interpreter takes the available relevant information (e.g., vocalizations, facial expressions, hand movements, all in the context of synchronic knowledge of linguistic and cultural systems, and other aspects of common ground) and looks for a way in which those cooccuring signs may simultaneously point to a single overall message of the move that a person is making. This is helped by the binding power of social cognition in an enchronic context (that is, the sequential context of turn-by-turn conversation), in particular the assumption that people are not merely saying things but making moves. The chapter focuses on co-speech hand gestures, and also discusses implications of the composite utterances approach to research on syntax, and on sign language.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::G Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary subjects::GT Interdisciplinary studies::GTC Communication studiesen_US
dc.subject.otherMultimodal Communication
dc.subject.otherEmbodiment
dc.titleChapter 44 A “Composite Utterances” approach to meaning 45. Towards a grammar of gestures
dc.title.alternativeA form-based view
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110261318.689
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3
oapen.relation.isPartOfBooke190effb-a9c0-4189-959e-5f8fea9521dd
oapen.relation.isFundedBy7292b17b-f01a-4016-94d3-d7fb5ef9fb79
oapen.relation.isbn9783110209624
oapen.collectionEuropean Research Council (ERC)
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston
oapen.grant.number240853
oapen.grant.acronymHSSLU
oapen.identifier.ocn1135847417


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record