Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYochim, Emily C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-09 03:00:32
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T09:35:52Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T09:35:52Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier1006124
dc.identifierOCN: 1228180541en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/24009
dc.description.abstractSkate Life examines how young male skateboarders use skate culture media in the production of their identities. Emily Chivers Yochim offers a comprehensive ethnographic analysis of an Ann Arbor, Michigan, skateboarding community, situating it within a larger historical examination of skateboarding's portrayal in mainstream media and a critique of mainstream, niche, and locally produced media texts (such as, for example, Jackass, Viva La Bam, and Dogtown and Z-Boys). The book uses these elements to argue that adolescent boys can both critique dominant norms of masculinity and maintain the power that white heterosexual masculinity offers. Additionally, Yochim uses these analyses to introduce the notion of ""corresponding cultures,"" conceptualizing the ways in which media audiences both argue with and incorporate mediated images into their own ideas about identity. In a strong combination of anthropological and media studies approaches, Skate Life asks important questions of the literature on youth and provides new ways of assessing how young people create their identities.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnologies of the Imagination: New Media in Everyday Life
dc.subject.otherMedia
dc.titleSkate Life: Re-Imagining White Masculinity
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.3998/toi.7300267.0001.001
oapen.relation.isPublishedBye07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889
oapen.relation.isbn9780472070800;9780472050802
oapen.pages240
oapen.place.publicationAnn Arbor
oapen.identifier.ocn1228180541
peerreview.anonymityDouble-anonymised
peerreview.idd98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityScientific or Editorial Board
peerreview.review.decisionYes
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeFull text
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleExternal Review of Whole Manuscript
oapen.review.commentsThe proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record