Digital Rhetoric
External Review of Whole Manuscript
Theory, Method, Practice
| dc.contributor.author | Eyman, Douglas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-09 03:00:31 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-01T09:36:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-04-01T09:36:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier | 1006096 | |
| dc.identifier | OCN: 913138568 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/24037 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A survey of a range of disciplines whose practitioners are venturing into the new field of digital rhetoric, examining the history of the ways digital and networked technologies inhabit and shape traditional rhetorical practices as well as considering new rhetorics made possible by current technologies | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Digital Humanities | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFG Semantics, discourse analysis, stylistics | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::U Computing and Information Technology::UB Information technology: general topics | en_US |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::U Computing and Information Technology::UG Graphical and digital media applications | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Media | |
| dc.title | Digital Rhetoric | |
| dc.title.alternative | Theory, Method, Practice | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/dh.13030181.0001.001 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472072682;9780472052684 | |
| oapen.pages | 177 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Ann Arbor | |
| oapen.identifier.ocn | 913138568 | |
| peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| peerreview.title | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |
