Manifesto for the Humanities: Transforming Doctoral Education in Good Enough Times
External Review of Whole Manuscript
dc.contributor.author | Ann Smith, Sidonie | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-09 03:00:31 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-01T09:37:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-01T09:37:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier | 1006091 | |
dc.identifier | OCN: 1135851252 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/24042 | |
dc.description.abstract | After a remarkable career in higher education, Sidonie Smith offers Manifesto for the Humanities as a reflective contribution to the current academic conversation over the place of the Humanities in the 21st century. Her focus is on doctoral education and opportunities she sees for its reform. Grounding this manifesto in background factors contributing to current “crises” in the humanities, Smith advocates for a 21st century doctoral education responsive to the changing ecology of humanistic scholarship and teaching. She elaborates a more expansive conceptualization of coursework and dissertation, a more robust, engaged public humanities, and a more diverse, collaborative, and networked sociality. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Digital Humanities | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNU Teaching of a specific subject | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Humanities | |
dc.title | Manifesto for the Humanities: Transforming Doctoral Education in Good Enough Times | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/dcbooks.13607059.0001.001 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472073047;9780472053049 | |
oapen.pages | 239 | |
oapen.place.publication | Ann Arbor | |
oapen.identifier.ocn | 1135851252 | |
peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |