Punishment and Political Order
External Review of Whole Manuscript
| dc.contributor.author | McBride, Keally | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-06 23:55 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-12 03:00:32 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-01T10:54:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-04-01T10:54:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007-06-08 | |
| dc.identifier | 1004159 | |
| dc.identifier | OCN: 655045792 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25921 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Most of us think of punishment as an ugly display of power. But punishment also tells us something about the ideals and aspirations of a people and their government. How a state punishes reveals whether or not it is confident in its own legitimacy and sovereignty. Punishment and Political Order examines the questions raised by the state’s exercise of punitive power—from what it is about human psychology that desires sanction and order to how the state can administer pain while calling for justice. Keally McBride's book demonstrates punishment's place at the core of political administration and the stated ideals of the polity. | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.subject.other | Political Science | |
| dc.subject.other | criminal justice | |
| dc.subject.other | punishment | |
| dc.title | Punishment and Political Order | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.133501 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
| oapen.relation.isFundedBy | b818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9780472901135;9780472901135 | |
| oapen.collection | Knowledge Unlatched (KU) | |
| oapen.place.publication | Ann Arbor | |
| oapen.grant.number | 102013 | |
| oapen.grant.program | KU Select 2018: HSS Backlist Books | |
| oapen.identifier.isbn | 9780472901135 | |
| grantor.number | 102013 | |
| oapen.identifier.ocn | 655045792 | |
| peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| peerreview.title | External Review of Whole Manuscript | |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |
