Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDymski, Gary A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17 09:55:44
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T12:19:43Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T12:19:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier1001704
dc.identifierOCN: 1083019444en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28272
dc.description.abstractThis paper reflects on the experience of the 1999–2002 minority pipeline program (MPP) at the University of California, Riverside. With support from the American Economic Association, the MPP identifi ed students of color interested in economics, let them explore economic issues aff ecting minority communities, and encouraged them to consider postgraduate work in economics. The MPP’s successes and failures can be traced to the shifting balance in California’s racialized political economy, especially a state ballot initiative forbidding the use of applicant race or ethnicity in University of California admission decisions, and to the transformation of economics itself, especially at the level of doctoral training. The MPP experience may be of relevance for other eff orts to increase racial/ethnic diversity in social science disciplines.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherCreating
dc.subject.otherdiverse economics
dc.subject.otherminority pipeline program
dc.subject.otherMPP
dc.titleChapter 7 The challenge of creating a more diverse economics
dc.title.alternativeLessons from the UCR minority pipeline project
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook3e6b5857-81ff-44cd-a975-55e8c14f2633
oapen.pages17
oapen.remark.public3-8-2020 - No DOI registered in CrossRef for ISBN 9780367001513
oapen.identifier.ocn1083019444
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record