Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBebbington, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorAbdulai, Abdul-Gafaru
dc.contributor.authorHumphreys Bebbington, Denise
dc.contributor.authorHinfelaar, Marja
dc.contributor.authorSanborn, Cynthia
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-03 09:09:28
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T12:33:43Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T12:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier1000322
dc.identifierOCN: 1076724227en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/29612
dc.description.abstractProposals for more effective natural resource governance emphasize the importance of institutions and governance, but say less about the political conditions under which institutional change occurs. This book synthesizes findings regarding the political drivers of institutional change in extractive industry governance. The authors analyse resource governance from the late nineteenth century to the present in Bolivia, Ghana, Peru, and Zambia. They focus on the ways in which resource governance and national political settlements interact. Special attention is paid to the nature of elite politics, the emergence of new political actors, forms of political contention, changing ideas regarding natural resources and development, the geography of natural resource deposits, and the influence of the transnational political economy of global commodity production. National elites and subnational actors are in continuous contention over extractive industry governance. Resource rents are used by elites to manage this contention and incorporate actors into governing coalitions and overall political settlements. Periodically, new resource frontiers are opened, and new political actors emerge with the power to redefine how extractive industries are governed and used as instruments for development. Colonial and post-colonial histories of resource extraction continue to give political valence to ideas of resource nationalism that mobilize actors who challenge existing institutional arrangements. The book is innovative in its focus on the political longue durée, and the use of in-depth, comparative, country-level analysis in Africa and Latin America, to build a theoretical argument that accounts for both similarity and divergence between these regions.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planningen_US
dc.subject.othermining
dc.subject.otherextractive industry
dc.subject.othernatural resource governance
dc.subject.otherpolitical settlements
dc.subject.otherBolivia
dc.subject.otherGhana
dc.subject.otherPeru
dc.subject.otherZambia
dc.subject.otherinclusive development
dc.subject.otherHydrocarbon
dc.titleGoverning Extractive Industries
dc.title.alternativePolitics, Histories, Ideas
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1093/oso/9780198820932.001.0001
oapen.relation.isPublishedByb9501915-cdee-4f2a-8030-9c0b187854b2
oapen.relation.isbn9780198820932
oapen.pages304
oapen.place.publicationOxford, UK
oapen.remark.publicRelevant Wikipedia pages: Bolivia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolivia; Ghana - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghana; Hydrocarbon - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrocarbon; Mining - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining; Natural resource - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_resource; Peru - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peru; Zambia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zambia
oapen.identifier.ocn1076724227


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record