Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMößner, Nicola
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20 23:55
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-17 14:59:15
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T12:34:16Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T12:34:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier1000313
dc.identifierOCN: 1051778720en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/29621
dc.description.abstractVisual representations (photographs, diagrams, etc.) play crucial roles in scientific processes. They help, for example, to communicate research results and hypotheses to scientific peers as well as to the lay audience. In genuine research activities they are used as evidence or as surrogates for research objects which are otherwise cognitively inaccessible. Despite their important functional roles in scientific practices, philosophers of science have more or less neglected visual representations in their analyses of epistemic methods and tools of reasoning in science. This book is meant to fill this gap. It presents a detailed investigation into central conceptual issues and into the epistemology of visual representations in science.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHistory and Philosophy of Technoscience
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherhistory
dc.subject.otherphilosophy, science
dc.subject.otherepistemology
dc.subject.otherastrophysics
dc.titleVisual Representations in Science
dc.title.alternativeConcept and Epistemology
dc.typebook
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb
oapen.relation.hasChaptereb093386-3a95-4310-b1a7-83c998bd0880
oapen.relation.isbn9781138089938
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.series.number13
oapen.pages372
oapen.identifier.ocn1051778720
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record