Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse
| dc.contributor.editor | Kaptein, Hendrik | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Velden, van der, Bastiaan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-06 23:55 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-10 14:46:32 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-01T12:41:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-04-01T12:41:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier | 650584 | |
| dc.identifier | OCN: 1052109031 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/29982 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This book brings together contributions from leading figures in legal studies on analogy and related forms of reasoning in the law. Analogical reasoning-which relies on the concept of two different things being in some way like each other-is hugely important not just in the practice of law, but it is nonetheless strongly contested. | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | legal analogy | |
| dc.subject.other | exemplary reasoning | |
| dc.subject.other | Deductive reasoning | |
| dc.subject.other | Inference | |
| dc.subject.other | Law | |
| dc.subject.other | Precedent | |
| dc.subject.other | Prima facie | |
| dc.title | Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.5117/9789462985902 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | dd3d1a33-0ac2-4cfe-a101-355ae1bd857a | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9789462985902 | |
| oapen.remark.public | Relevant Wikipedia pages: Analogy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogy; Deductive reasoning - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning; Exemplum - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exemplum; Inference - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference; Law - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law; Precedent - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent; Prima facie - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prima_facie | |
| oapen.identifier.ocn | 1052109031 |
