Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLepselter, Susan
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-18 23:55
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-12 03:00:29
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T12:44:24Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T12:44:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-01
dc.identifier650026
dc.identifierOCN: 1166426491en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30074
dc.description.abstractThe Resonance of Unseen Things offers an ethnographic meditation on the “uncanny” persistence and cultural freight of conspiracy theory. The project is a reading of conspiracy theory as an index of a certain strain of late 20th-century American despondency and malaise, especially as understood by people experiencing downward social mobility. Written by a cultural anthropologist with a literary background, this deeply interdisciplinary book focuses on the enduring American preoccupation with captivity in a rapidly transforming world. Captivity is a trope that appears in both ordinary and fantastic iterations here, and Susan Lepselter shows how multiple troubled histories—of race, class, gender, and power—become compressed into stories of uncanny memory.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.otherAnthropology
dc.subject.otherAlien abduction
dc.subject.otherCaptivity narrative
dc.subject.otherUnidentified flying object
dc.titleResonance of Unseen Things
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.3998/mpub.7172850
oapen.relation.isPublishedBye07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889
oapen.relation.isFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9
oapen.relation.isbn9780472900657
oapen.collectionKnowledge Unlatched (KU)
oapen.place.publicationAnn Arbor
oapen.grant.number103494
oapen.grant.programKU Round 2
oapen.redirect608301
oapen.remark.publicRelevant Wikipedia pages: Alien abduction - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_abduction; Captivity narrative - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captivity_narrative; Unidentified flying object - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidentified_flying_object
oapen.identifier.ocn1166426491
peerreview.anonymityDouble-anonymised
peerreview.idd98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityScientific or Editorial Board
peerreview.review.decisionYes
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeFull text
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleExternal Review of Whole Manuscript
oapen.review.commentsThe proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record