Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorPodger, Andrew
dc.contributor.editorSu, Tsai-tsu
dc.contributor.editorWanna, John
dc.contributor.editorS. Chan, Hon
dc.contributor.editorNiu, Meili
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-15 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T13:08:06Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T13:08:06Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier643778
dc.identifierOCN: 1023531861en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30705
dc.description.abstract"The Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration has held annual workshops since 2011 on public administration themes of common interest to the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan and Australia. This book presents and discusses a selection of papers developed from the Dialogue’s fifth workshop held in late 2015 hosted by the National Taiwan University in Taipei. The theme, ‘Value for Money’, focused on budget and financial management reforms, including how different nations account for the relative performance of their public sectors. All governments face the challenge of scarce resources requiring budgetary management processes for identifying the resources required by and available to government, and then for allocating them and ensuring their use or deployment represents value for money. Such budgetary and financial management processes need to inform decision-making routinely and protect the integrity of the way public resources are used – with some public accountability to indicate that their uses are properly authorised and reflect the policies of legitimate government leaders. The chapters in this book explore budgeting and financial management in three very different jurisdictions: Australia, the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China (Taiwan). These activist and at times innovative countries are keen to analyse and reflect upon each other’s policy achievements and patterns of public provision. They are keen to learn more about each other as their economic and social engagement continues to deepen. They are also conscious that fundamental differences exist in terms of economic development and global strategic positioning, and levels and philosophies of political development; to an extent these differences are representative of differences amongst countries around the globe."
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1M Australasia, Oceania, Pacific Islands, Atlantic Islands::1MB Australia and New Zealand / Aotearoaen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPP Public administrationen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherpublic administration
dc.subject.otheraustralia
dc.subject.otherfinancial management
dc.subject.otherasia
dc.subject.otherbudget management
dc.subject.otherAccountability
dc.subject.otherAudit
dc.subject.otherChina
dc.subject.otherInfrastructure
dc.subject.otherResearch and development
dc.subject.otherTaiwan
dc.titleValue for Money
dc.title.alternativeBudget and financial management reform in the People's Republic of China, Taiwan and Australia
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.22459/VM.01.2018
oapen.relation.isPublishedByddc8cc3f-dd57-40ef-b8d5-06f839686b71
oapen.relation.isbn9781760461799
oapen.remark.publicRelevant Wikipedia pages: Accountability - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accountability; Audit - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audit; Australia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia; China - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China; Finance - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finance; Infrastructure - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructure; Research and development - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_and_development; Taiwan - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan
oapen.identifier.ocn1023531861


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record