Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcBride, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-16 23:55
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-01 23:55:55
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-16 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T13:14:54Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T13:14:54Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier641856
dc.identifierOCN: 1014200322en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30832
dc.description.abstract"How do we know what we know? In this stimulating and rigorous book, Mark McBride explores two sets of issues in contemporary epistemology: the problems that warrant transmission poses for the category of basic knowledge; and the status of conclusive reasons, sensitivity, and safety as conditions that are necessary for knowledge. To have basic knowledge is to know (have justification for) some proposition immediately, i.e., knowledge (justification) that doesn’t depend on justification for any other proposition. This book considers several puzzles that arise when you take seriously the possibility that we can have basic knowledge. McBride’s analysis draws together two vital strands in contemporary epistemology that are usually treated in isolation from each other. Additionally, its innovative arguments include a new application of the safety condition to the law. This book will be of interest to epistemologists―both professionals and students. "
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFA Philosophy of languageen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::G Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary subjects::GT Interdisciplinary studies::GTK Cognitive studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTK Philosophy: epistemology and theory of knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.otherjustifications
dc.subject.othersafety condition
dc.subject.othersensitivity
dc.subject.otherbasic knowledge
dc.subject.otherepistemology
dc.subject.otherconclusive reasons
dc.subject.otherBrain in a vat
dc.subject.otherCoherentism
dc.subject.otherDogma
dc.subject.otherFallibilism
dc.subject.otherFoundationalism
dc.subject.otherFred Dretske
dc.subject.otherInference
dc.subject.otherLogical consequence
dc.subject.otherRobert Nozick
dc.titleBasic Knowledge and Conditions on Knowledge
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.11647/OBP.0104
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy23117811-c361-47b4-8b76-2c9b160c9a8b
oapen.relation.isbn9781783742837
oapen.collectionScholarLed
oapen.pages238
oapen.remark.publicRelevant Wikipedia pages: Brain in a vat - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_in_a_vat; Coherentism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherentism; Dogma - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogma; Epistemology - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology; Fallibilism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism; Foundationalism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundationalism; Fred Dretske - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Dretske; Inference - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference; Logical consequence - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence; Robert Nozick - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Nozick
oapen.identifier.ocn1014200322


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record