Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKleinod, Michael,
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-04 23:55
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28 13:38:46
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T13:50:25Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T13:50:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier624990
dc.identifierOCN: 982228847en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31820
dc.description.abstractThis study treats ecotourism in National Protected Areas of Lao PDR as a “recreational frontier” which instrumentalizes the recreation of human natures in capitalism’s centers for that of nonhuman natures at capitalism’s (closing) frontiers. This world-ecological practice of ecorational instrumentality – i.e. of nature domination in the name of “Nature” – presents a remedy for capitalism’s crisis that is itself crisis-ridden, enacting a central tension of ecocapitalism: that between “conservation” and “development”. This epistemic-institutional tension is traced through the preconditions, modes and effects of ecotourism in Laos by gradually zooming from the most general scale of societal nature relations into the most detailed intricacies of ecotouristic practice. The combination of Bourdieu, Marx and Critical Theory enables a systematic analysis of the recreational frontier as enactment of various contradictions deriving from the “false-and-real” Nature/Society dualism.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherLaos
dc.subject.otherecotourism
dc.subject.otherrecreation
dc.subject.otherecocapitalism
dc.subject.otherCapitalism
dc.subject.otherEcotourism
dc.subject.otherLaos
dc.subject.otherTourism
dc.titleThe Recreational Frontier - Ecotourism in Laos as Ecorational Instrumentality
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageThis study treats ecotourism in National Protected Areas of Lao PDR as a “recreational frontier” which instrumentalizes the recreation of human natures in capitalism’s centers for that of nonhuman natures at capitalism’s (closing) frontiers. This world-ecological practice of ecorational instrumentality – i.e. of nature domination in the name of “Nature” – presents a remedy for capitalism’s crisis that is itself crisis-ridden, enacting a central tension of ecocapitalism: that between “conservation” and “development”. This epistemic-institutional tension is traced through the preconditions, modes and effects of ecotourism in Laos by gradually zooming from the most general scale of societal nature relations into the most detailed intricacies of ecotouristic practice. The combination of Bourdieu, Marx and Critical Theory enables a systematic analysis of the recreational frontier as enactment of various contradictions deriving from the “false-and-real” Nature/Society dualism.
oapen.identifier.doi10.17875/gup2017-1006
oapen.relation.isPublishedByffaff15c-73ed-45cd-8be1-56a881b51f62
oapen.relation.isbn9783863952464
oapen.remark.publicRelevant Wikipedia pages: Capitalism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism; Ecotourism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecotourism; Laos - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laos; Tourism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism
oapen.identifier.ocn982228847


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record