Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHauser-Schäublin, Brigitta,
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-31 23:55:55
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-07 13:46:34
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T14:13:27Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T14:13:27Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier610301
dc.identifierOCN: 869662345en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32549
dc.description.abstractA number of UN conventions and declarations (on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions and the World Heritage Conventions) can be understood as instruments of international governance to promote democracy and social justice worldwide. In Indonesia (as in many other countries), these international agreements have encouraged the self-assertion of communities that had been oppressed and deprived of their land, especially during the New Order regime (1966-1998). More than 2,000 communities in Indonesia who define themselves as masyarakat adat or “indigenous peoples” had already joined the Indigenous Peoples’ Alliance of the Archipelago” (AMAN) by 2013. In their efforts to gain recognition and selfdetermination, these communities are supported by international donors and international as well as national NGOs by means of development programmes. In the definition of masyarakat adat, “culture” or adat plays an important role in the communities’ self-definition. Based on particular characteristics of their adat, the asset of their culture, they try to distinguish themselves from others in order to substantiate their claims for the restitution of their traditional rights and property (namely land and other natural resources) from the state. The authors of this volume investigate how differently structured communities - socially, politically and religiously - and associations reposition themselves vis-à-vis others, especially the state, not only by drawing on adat for achieving particular goals, but also dignity and a better future.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEthnology
dc.subject.otherCultural Property
dc.subject.otherIndigenous Peoples
dc.subject.otherAdat
dc.subject.otherIndonesia
dc.subject.otherTobelo
dc.subject.otherToraja
dc.subject.otherWanna
dc.subject.otherPakistan
dc.titleAdat and Indigeneity in Indonesia - Culture and Entitlements between Heteronomy and Self-Ascription
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageA number of UN conventions and declarations (on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions and the World Heritage Conventions) can be understood as instruments of international governance to promote democracy and social justice worldwide. In Indonesia (as in many other countries), these international agreements have encouraged the self-assertion of communities that had been oppressed and deprived of their land, especially during the New Order regime (1966-1998). More than 2,000 communities in Indonesia who define themselves as masyarakat adat or “indigenous peoples” had already joined the Indigenous Peoples’ Alliance of the Archipelago” (AMAN) by 2013. In their efforts to gain recognition and selfdetermination, these communities are supported by international donors and international as well as national NGOs by means of development programmes. In the definition of masyarakat adat, “culture” or adat plays an important role in the communities’ self-definition. Based on particular characteristics of their adat, the asset of their culture, they try to distinguish themselves from others in order to substantiate their claims for the restitution of their traditional rights and property (namely land and other natural resources) from the state. The authors of this volume investigate how differently structured communities - socially, politically and religiously - and associations reposition themselves vis-à-vis others, especially the state, not only by drawing on adat for achieving particular goals, but also dignity and a better future.
oapen.identifier.doi10.4000/books.gup.150
oapen.relation.isPublishedByffaff15c-73ed-45cd-8be1-56a881b51f62
oapen.remark.publicRelevant Wikipedia pages: Adat - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adat; Indigenous peoples - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples; Indonesia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia; Tobelo - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobelo; Toraja - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toraja; Wanna, Pakistan - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanna,_Pakistan


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record