Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGroth, Stefan,
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-31 23:55:55
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-07 13:46:34
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T14:13:28Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T14:13:28Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier610300
dc.identifierOCN: 842296422en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32550
dc.description.abstractCommunicative interactions in international negotiations on cultural property not only provide information about the emergence and proliferation of arguments, rhetorics, and registers, but also permit valuable insights into actors’ positions, strategies and alliances. They significantly influence local and national practices and views related to cultural property debates. What can be gained from a deep analysis of the communicative patterns and strategies that actors engage in – the entailing text and talk of negotiations – is a better understanding of the process itself: how do different actors argue, what kind of strategies and rhetorics do they use, to which instruments and institutions do they refer, and in what way do actors react to each other? An analysis of communicative interactions contributes to the question of how international negotiations work. The analytic inclusion of sociolinguistic practices allows insights into positions, strategies, and perspectives pertaining to cultural property. By looking at not only what actors say, but also at how and in what contexts they do so, it is possible to make more accurate statements about their positions and perceptions in cultural property debates. As these communicative interactions influence outcomes considerably, an approach from linguistic anthropology is not only beneficial for an understanding of specific negotiations, but also for the analysis of broader cultural property issues.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JF Society & culture: general
dc.subject.classificationbic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JF Society & culture: general::JFC Cultural studies
dc.subject.otherCultural Property
dc.subject.otherCommunicative Interactions
dc.subject.otherRhetorics
dc.subject.otherLinguistic Anthropology
dc.subject.otherEuropean Union
dc.subject.otherIndexicality
dc.subject.otherIndigenous peoples
dc.subject.otherIntellectual property
dc.subject.otherOpening statement
dc.subject.otherPragmatics
dc.subject.otherSpeech community
dc.subject.otherTraditional knowledge
dc.subject.otherWorld Intellectual Property Organization
dc.titleNegotiating Tradition - The pragmatics of international deliberations on Cultural Property
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageCommunicative interactions in international negotiations on cultural property not only provide information about the emergence and proliferation of arguments, rhetorics, and registers, but also permit valuable insights into actors’ positions, strategies and alliances. They significantly influence local and national practices and views related to cultural property debates. What can be gained from a deep analysis of the communicative patterns and strategies that actors engage in – the entailing text and talk of negotiations – is a better understanding of the process itself: how do different actors argue, what kind of strategies and rhetorics do they use, to which instruments and institutions do they refer, and in what way do actors react to each other? An analysis of communicative interactions contributes to the question of how international negotiations work. The analytic inclusion of sociolinguistic practices allows insights into positions, strategies, and perspectives pertaining to cultural property. By looking at not only what actors say, but also at how and in what contexts they do so, it is possible to make more accurate statements about their positions and perceptions in cultural property debates. As these communicative interactions influence outcomes considerably, an approach from linguistic anthropology is not only beneficial for an understanding of specific negotiations, but also for the analysis of broader cultural property issues.
oapen.identifier.doi10.4000/books.gup.608
oapen.relation.isPublishedByffaff15c-73ed-45cd-8be1-56a881b51f62
oapen.remark.publicRelevant Wikipedia pages: European Union - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union; Indexicality - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indexicality; Indigenous peoples - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples; Intellectual property - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property; Opening statement - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opening_statement; Pragmatics - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatics; Speech community - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_community; Traditional knowledge - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_knowledge; World Intellectual Property Organization - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Organization


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record