Logo Oapen
  • Join
    • Deposit
    • For Librarians
    • For Publishers
    • For Researchers
    • Funders
    • Resources
    • OAPEN
        View Item 
        •   OAPEN Home
        • View Item
        •   OAPEN Home
        • View Item
        JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

        Dignitas - Voluntas - Vita - Überlegungen zur Sterbehilfe aus rechtshistorischer, interdisziplinärer und rechtsvergleichender Sicht Göttinger Antrittsvorlesung im Januar 2006

        Thumbnail
        Download PDF Viewer
        Web Shop
        Author(s)
        Schumann, Eva,
        Collection
        AG Universitätsverlage
        Language
        German
        Show full item record
        Abstract
        Contrary to the common constriction of the euthanasia-discussion on “self-determination at the end of life" Eva Schumann claims rethinking in dealing with seriously ill and dying people. To meet their needs in her view a comprehensive access to outpatient and inpatient palliative care facilities is recquired and also improvements of care in nursing homes as well as offers to improve the integration of members into care. These claims conclude the discussion between assistance in dying (indirect euthanasia), and assistance to die (active and passive euthanasia). Taking account historical, interdisciplinary and comparative law issues it is demonstrated that the formal legal distinction between the various case groups of euthanasia not sufficiently takes into account the social dimension of dying.
         
        Entgegen der heute üblichen Verengung der Sterbehilfediskussion auf die »Selbstbestimmung am Lebensende« fordert Eva Schumann ein Umdenken im Umgang mit schwerkranken und sterbenden Menschen. Um deren Bedürfnissen gerecht zu werden, ist nach ihrer Auffassung ein flächendeckender Zugang zu ambulanten und stationären Palliativeinrichtungen, eine Verbesserung der Betreuung in Alten- und Pflegeheimen sowie Angebote zur stärkeren Einbindung von Angehörigen in die Pflege erforderlich. Diese Forderungen stehen am Ende einer kritischen Würdigung der unter dem Begriff der Sterbehilfe diskutierten Fallgruppen der Hilfe im Sterben (indirekte Sterbehilfe) einerseits und der Hilfe zum Sterben (aktive und passive Sterbehilfe) andererseits. Unter Einbeziehung historischer, interdisziplinärer und rechtsvergleichender Aspekte wird eindringlich dargelegt, dass die formaljuristische Differenzierung zwischen den einzelnen Fallgruppen der Sterbehilfe nicht hinreichend die soziale Dimension des Sterbens berücksichtigt.
         
        URI
        http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32678
        Keywords
        law; euthanasia; geriatric welfare; Arzt; Neue Juristische Wochenschrift; Patientenverfügung; Sterbehilfe
        DOI
        10.17875/gup2006-21
        ISBN
        9783938616499
        OCN
        808384788
        Publisher
        Universitätsverlag Göttingen
        Publication date and place
        2006
        Classification
        Ethical issues: euthanasia and right to die
        Law
        Criminal law: procedure and offences
        Public remark
        Relevant Wikipedia pages: Arzt - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arzt; Neue Juristische Wochenschrift - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neue_Juristische_Wochenschrift; Patientenverfügung - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patientenverf%C3%BCgung; Sterbehilfe - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterbehilfe
        Rights
        http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/de/deed.de
        • Imported or submitted locally

        Browse

        All of OAPENSubjectsPublishersLanguagesCollections

        My Account

        LoginRegister

        Export

        Repository metadata
        Logo Oapen
        • For Librarians
        • For Publishers
        • For Researchers
        • Funders
        • Resources
        • OAPEN

        Newsletter

        • Subscribe to our newsletter
        • view our news archive

        Follow us on

        License

        • If not noted otherwise all contents are available under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

        Credits

        • logo EU
        • This project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 683680, 810640, 871069 and 964352.

        OAPEN is based in the Netherlands, with its registered office in the National Library in The Hague.

        Director: Niels Stern

        Address:
        OAPEN Foundation
        Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5
        2595 BE The Hague
        Postal address:
        OAPEN Foundation
        P.O. Box 90407
        2509 LK The Hague

        Websites:
        OAPEN Home: www.oapen.org
        OAPEN Library: library.oapen.org
        DOAB: www.doabooks.org

         

         

        Export search results

        The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Differen formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

        A logged-in user can export up to 15000 items. If you're not logged in, you can export no more than 500 items.

        To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

        After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.