Chapter 2 The Saturation of Racial Inequities in the United States
dc.contributor.author | Gooden, Susan T. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-20T13:58:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-20T13:58:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41391 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this compelling book the author contends that social equity--specifically racial equity--is a nervous area of government. Over the course of history, this nervousness has stifled many individuals and organizations, thus leading to an inability to seriously advance the reduction of racial inequities in government. The author asserts that until this nervousness is effectively managed, public administration social equity efforts designed to reduce racial inequities cannot realize their full potential. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.subject.other | administrator | |
dc.subject.other | administrators | |
dc.subject.other | area | |
dc.subject.other | disparities | |
dc.subject.other | individual | |
dc.subject.other | inequities | |
dc.subject.other | nervous | |
dc.subject.other | public | |
dc.subject.other | racial | |
dc.subject.other | talk | |
dc.title | Chapter 2 The Saturation of Racial Inequities in the United States | |
dc.type | chapter | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781315701301 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | |
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook | 3ffee9cb-1ae9-499a-992a-a30cc471a91c | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780765637185 | |
peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |