Essays on the Modern Japanese Church
Christianity in Meiji Japan
| dc.contributor.author | Yamaji, Aizan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-03T13:54:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-03T13:54:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20200903_9780472901913_15 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41570 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Essays on the Modern Japanese Church (Gendai Nihon kyokai shiron), published in 1906, was the first Japanese-language history of Christianity in Meiji Japan. Yamaji Aizan’s firsthand account describes the reintroduction of Christianity to Japan—its development, rapid expansion, and decline—and its place in the social, political, and intellectual life of the Meiji period. Yamaji’s overall argument is that Christianity played a crucial role in shaping the growth and development of modern Japan. | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Michigan Monograph Series in Japanese Studies | |
| dc.subject.other | Society and social sciences | |
| dc.subject.other | Medical anthropology | |
| dc.subject.other | Veterinary medicine: infectious diseases and therapeutics | |
| dc.title | Essays on the Modern Japanese Church | |
| dc.title.alternative | Christianity in Meiji Japan | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.22854 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
| oapen.imprint | U of M Center For Japanese Studies | |
| oapen.series.number | 27 | |
| oapen.pages | 207 | |
| peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |
