Early Communist China
Two Studies
| dc.contributor.author | Suleski, Ronald | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bays, Daniel H. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-23T15:13:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-23T15:13:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20200923_9780472902194_11 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41815 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Contains two detailed case studies. In “The Fu-t’ien Incident, December 1930,” Ronald Suleski describes the pivotal incident in the power struggle between Mao Zedong and the Communist Central Committee. Daniel Bays’s study of “Agrarian Reform in Kwangtung, 1950–1953” focuses upon the measures taken by the Chinese Communist Party to control and eventually collectivize rural elites in Kwangtung province. | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Michigan Monographs In Chinese Studies | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Sociology and anthropology | |
| dc.title | Early Communist China | |
| dc.title.alternative | Two Studies | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.19155 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
| oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0314e571-4102-4526-b014-3ed8f2d6750a | |
| oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0cdc3d7c-5c59-49ed-9dba-ad641acd8fd1 | |
| oapen.imprint | U OF M CENTER FOR CHINESE STUDIES | |
| oapen.series.number | 4 | |
| oapen.pages | 89 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Ann Arbor | |
| oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
| oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
| peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |
