Classifying the Zhuangzi Chapters
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Xiaogan | |
dc.contributor.editor | Liu, Xiaogan | |
dc.contributor.editor | Savage, William | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-23T15:16:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-23T15:16:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20200923_9780472901340_35 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41839 | |
dc.description.abstract | The relationships, both historical and philosophical, among the Zhuangzi’s Inner, Outer, and Miscellaneous chapters are the subject of ancient and enduring controversy. Liu marshals linguistic, intertextual, intratextual, and historical evidence to establish an objectively demonstrable chronology and determine the philosophical affiliations among the various chapters. This major advance in Zhuangzi scholarship furnishes indispensable data for all students of the great Daoist text. In a lengthy afterword, Liu compares his conclusions with those of A. C. Graham and addresses the relationship between the Zhuangzi and the Laozi. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language | Chinese | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Michigan Monographs In Chinese Studies | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Sociology and anthropology | |
dc.title | Classifying the Zhuangzi Chapters | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.19186 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0314e571-4102-4526-b014-3ed8f2d6750a | |
oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0cdc3d7c-5c59-49ed-9dba-ad641acd8fd1 | |
oapen.imprint | U OF M CENTER FOR CHINESE STUDIES | |
oapen.series.number | 65 | |
oapen.pages | 241 | |
oapen.place.publication | Ann Arbor | |
oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |