Aryan and Non-Aryan in India
| dc.contributor.editor | Deshpande, Madhav M. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Hook, Peter E. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-23T15:18:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-23T15:18:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20200923_9780472901685_49 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41853 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In holding the January 1981 auto conference, the Center took it as their task to begin addressing the critical issues facing the industry, with particular, but not exclusive, attention to examining the role of the Japanese auto industry. They had in mind not to simply conduct a rational discussion of the trade issue but to probe the sources of Japanese competitive strength, especially those features whose study might profit them. | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Michigan Papers On South And Southeast Asia | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Sociology and anthropology | |
| dc.title | Aryan and Non-Aryan in India | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.19419 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
| oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0314e571-4102-4526-b014-3ed8f2d6750a | |
| oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0cdc3d7c-5c59-49ed-9dba-ad641acd8fd1 | |
| oapen.imprint | U OF M CENTER FOR SOUTH ASIAN STUDIES | |
| oapen.series.number | 14 | |
| oapen.pages | 329 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Ann Arbor | |
| oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
| oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
| peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
| peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
| peerreview.open.review | No | |
| peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
| peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
| peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
| peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
| peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
| oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |
