Mongrel Nation
Diasporic Culture and the Making of Postcolonial Britain
dc.contributor.author | Dawson, Ashley | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-15T11:04:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-15T11:04:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20201215_9780472900978_9 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/43323 | |
dc.description.abstract | Mongrel Nation surveys the history of the United Kingdom's African, Asian, and Caribbean populations from 1948 to the present, working at the juncture of cultural studies, literary criticism, and postcolonial theory. Ashley Dawson argues that during the past fifty years Asian and black intellectuals from Sam Selvon to Zadie Smith have continually challenged the United Kingdom's exclusionary definitions of citizenship, using innovative forms of cultural expression to reconfigure definitions of belonging in the postcolonial age. By examining popular culture and exploring topics such as the nexus of race and gender, the growth of transnational politics, and the clash between first- and second-generation immigrants, Dawson broadens and enlivens the field of postcolonial studies. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DS Literature: history and criticism | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Britain | |
dc.subject.other | sociology | |
dc.subject.other | African, Asian, and Caribbean populations | |
dc.title | Mongrel Nation | |
dc.title.alternative | Diasporic Culture and the Making of Postcolonial Britain | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.206486 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
oapen.imprint | University of Michigan Press | |
oapen.pages | 241 | |
peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |