Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirk, Robert G W
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-05T12:35:46Z
dc.date.available2021-05-05T12:35:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48495
dc.description.abstractThis chapter adopts a historical perspective to explore how material infrastructures have structured human–animal relationships within the biomedical “animal house,” c.1945 to the present. It argues material infrastructures serve to structure the multiple values that have informed and shaped human–animal relations within the experimental biomedical sciences. By exploring how multispecies sociocultural relations performatively shape and are shaped by the physical infrastructures that make up lived relations and shared labor in the animal house and laboratory, the chapter charts how “multispecies relations” form a dynamic, situated and emergent “moral economy” wherein the moral economy cannot be separated from factors that would properly be associated with a political economy of animal-dependent experimental science.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing::MQ Nursing and ancillary services::MQW Biomedical engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otheranimal housing; biomedical sciences; historical perspectiveen_US
dc.titleChapter 11 Care in the Cageen_US
dc.title.alternativeMaterializing Moral Economies of Animal Care in the Biomedical Sciences, c.1945-en_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook761fd343-6bf2-40ea-8b79-39bd26457821en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfden_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781138854116en_US
oapen.collectionWellcomeen_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages20en_US
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record