Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVäliverronen, Esa
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:15:54Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49683
dc.description.abstractThis chapter reviews the mediatisation concept, which has recently made a strong impact in media and communication studies, particularly in the field of political communication but also in science communication. It discusses the outcomes and problems of mediatisation research in relation to shifting science communication practices. The chapter introduces the concept of promotional culture in order to put the mediatisation of science into the broader social and cultural context of commercialisation and marketisation of research and universities. It argues that the adoption of quasi-corporative promotional practices in universities and research institutes poses a threat to academic freedom and the role of science as a public good.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociologyen_US
dc.subject.otherscience; technologyen_US
dc.titleChapter 8 Mediatisation of science and the rise of promotional cultureen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003039242-8en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook88490ec5-9430-4aae-be18-bbaedc6ea835en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780367483128en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages19en_US
oapen.remark.publicThe funder for this chapter is University of Helsinki
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record