Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie
Interpretationsbesonderheiten bei Komplementreduktionen lexikalischer Einheiten
dc.contributor.author | von der Becke, Tanja | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-26T12:27:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-26T12:27:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20210726_9783110726268_31 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1612-8702 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50228 | |
dc.language | German | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFG Semantics, discourse analysis, stylistics | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFK Grammar, syntax and morphology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Argument omission | |
dc.subject.other | polysemy | |
dc.subject.other | verb valency | |
dc.title | Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie | |
dc.title.alternative | Interpretationsbesonderheiten bei Komplementreduktionen lexikalischer Einheiten | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.abstract.otherlanguage | Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb. | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.1515/9783110726268 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110726268 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110726831 | |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110726374 | |
oapen.imprint | De Gruyter | |
oapen.series.number | 91 | |
oapen.pages | 355 | |
oapen.place.publication | Berlin/Boston |