Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHogrefe, Arne
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-07T16:15:58Z
dc.date.available2021-12-07T16:15:58Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierONIX_20211207_9783110216615_65
dc.identifier.issn1862-1139
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/51710
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMillennium-Studien / Millennium Studies
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHC Ancient historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRM Christianityen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRA Religion: general::QRAX History of religionen_US
dc.subject.otherAugustine
dc.subject.otherDonatism
dc.subject.otherDivision of the Church
dc.subject.otherSchism
dc.titleUmstrittene Vergangenheit
dc.title.alternativeHistorische Argumente in der Auseinandersetzung Augustins mit den Donatisten
dc.typebook
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageThe struggle with the Donatists in North Africa dominated Augustine`s term of office as bishop. In order to disprove their views, in his writings not only did he employ theological arguments, he also referred to events which occurred at the time of the origins of the schism. Augustine`s aim was to use historical documents to prove that the Donatists had no right to claim that they represented the pure Church, free of "traditores". The Donatists reacted to this challenge by developing their own version of the history of the schism. This study draws on Augustine`s anti-Donatist writings to analyse and assess the historical arguments and views of both groups.
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110216615
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2b386f62-fc18-4108-bcf1-ade3ed4cf2f3
oapen.relation.isbn9783110216615
oapen.relation.isbn9783110203639
oapen.series.number24
oapen.pages394
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record