Chapter Interlude
Proposal review
On shortcomings of the instrumentalist view
dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, Jan Cornelius | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-02T11:28:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-02T11:28:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/53178 | |
dc.description.abstract | This interlude chapter—between the analysis and assessment of the status-quo (chapters 2–5; first part of the book) and the visions and prospects for the future of interdisciplinary knowledge production (the following chapters 6–8; second part of the book)—addresses shortcomings of the instrumentalist view of interdisciplinarity and its isolated focus on recipes and organization procedures. This chapter questions the positivist fact/value dichotomy; it refers to critical materialist and transcendental pragmatist thinking; it considers viewpoints of environmentalism and reflects on insights from phenomenology and from Martin Heidegger; and it discusses recent developments resulting from a participatory approach among the sciences which could contribute to a new view of human-nature relations (self-organization theory, complex systems theory). Essentially, the interlude chapter paves the way for a critical-reflexive concept of problem-oriented interdisciplinarity. Based on the analysis here, the final three chapters provide a theoretical framework (chapter 6) and present case studies (chapter 7 & 8) showing that a more critical-reflexive perspective in (and with) interdisciplinarity is feasible and can be incorporated in the practice of interdisciplinarity for a sustainable future of our knowledge society. | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PD Science: general issues::PDR Impact of science and technology on society | en_US |
dc.subject.other | History of Science; History of Technology; Philosophy of Technology; Scientific Ethics; Synthetic Biology | en_US |
dc.title | Chapter Interlude | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | On shortcomings of the instrumentalist view | en_US |
dc.type | chapter | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781315387109-6 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | en_US |
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook | cc8609ba-efd4-4fdf-b145-eb87a6434c9c | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781138230071 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781032118468 | en_US |
oapen.imprint | Routledge | en_US |
oapen.pages | 10 | en_US |
oapen.remark.public | Funder name: Darmstadt University | |
peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |