Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorErcikan, Kadriye
dc.contributor.editorPellegrino, James W.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T08:39:42Z
dc.date.available2022-04-26T08:39:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierONIX_20220426_9781317483342_7
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/54173
dc.description.abstractDespite developments in research and practice on using examinee response process data in assessment design, the use of such data in test validation is rare. Validation of Score Meaning in the Next Generation of Assessments Using Response Processes highlights the importance of validity evidence based on response processes and provides guidance to measurement researchers and practitioners in creating and using such evidence as a regular part of the assessment validation process. Response processes refer to approaches and behaviors of examinees when they interpret assessment situations and formulate and generate solutions as revealed through verbalizations, eye movements, response times, or computer clicks. Such response process data can provide information about the extent to which items and tasks engage examinees in the intended ways. With contributions from the top researchers in the field of assessment, this volume includes chapters that focus on methodological issues and on applications across multiple contexts of assessment interpretation and use. In Part I of this book, contributors discuss the framing of validity as an evidence-based argument for the interpretation of the meaning of test scores, the specifics of different methods of response process data collection and analysis, and the use of response process data relative to issues of validation as highlighted in the joint standards on testing. In Part II, chapter authors offer examples that illustrate the use of response process data in assessment validation. These cases are provided specifically to address issues related to the analysis and interpretation of performance on assessments of complex cognition, assessments designed to inform classroom learning and instruction, and assessments intended for students with varying cultural and linguistic backgrounds.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JND Educational systems and structures::JNDH Education: examinations and assessmenten_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JM Psychology::JMB Psychological methodology::JMBT Psychological testing and measurementen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNC Educational psychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAndreas Oranje
dc.subject.otherApplications of Educational Measurement and Assessment
dc.subject.otherAssessment
dc.subject.otherBrian D. Gane
dc.subject.otherDeirdre Kerr
dc.subject.otherEducational Assessment
dc.subject.otherEducational Evaluation
dc.subject.otherEducational Measurement
dc.subject.otherEducational Methodology
dc.subject.otherErcikan
dc.subject.otherEvaluation
dc.subject.otherGame-Based Assessment
dc.subject.otherGerald Tindal
dc.subject.otherGuillermo Solano-Flores
dc.subject.otherIsaac I. Bejar
dc.subject.otherJacqueline P. Leighton
dc.subject.otherJames W. Pellegrino
dc.subject.otherJoanna Gorin
dc.subject.otherJoseph F. T. Nese
dc.subject.otherJulie Alonzo
dc.subject.otherKristen Huff
dc.subject.otherLaura Wright
dc.subject.otherLauress L. Wise
dc.subject.otherLeilani S
dc.subject.otherLouis V. DiBello
dc.subject.otherMagda Chía
dc.subject.otherMichael Kane
dc.subject.otherNCME
dc.subject.otherPaul Nichols
dc.subject.otherPellegrino
dc.titleValidation of Score Meaning for the Next Generation of Assessments
dc.title.alternativeThe Use of Response Processes
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781315708591
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb
oapen.relation.isbn9781317483342
oapen.relation.isbn9781138898370
oapen.relation.isbn9781138898363
oapen.relation.isbn9781315708591
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages164
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record