Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorStrömbäck, Jesper
dc.contributor.editorWikforss, Åsa
dc.contributor.editorGlüer, Kathrin
dc.contributor.editorLindholm, Torun
dc.contributor.editorOscarsson, Henrik
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-18T09:38:18Z
dc.date.available2022-05-18T09:38:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierONIX_20220518_9781000599121_6
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/54482
dc.description.abstractThis book offers a truly interdisciplinary exploration of our patterns of engagement with politics, news, and information in current high-choice information environments. Putting forth the notion that high-choice information environments may contribute to increasing misperceptions and knowledge resistance rather than greater public knowledge, the book offers insights into the processes that influence the supply of misinformation and factors influencing how and why people expose themselves to and process information that may support or contradict their beliefs and attitudes. A team of authors from across a range of disciplines address the phenomena of knowledge resistance and its causes and consequences at the macro- as well as the micro-level. The chapters take a philosophical look at the notion of knowledge resistance, before moving on to discuss issues such as misinformation and fake news, psychological mechanisms such as motivated reasoning in processes of selective exposure and attention, how people respond to evidence and fact-checking, the role of political partisanship, political polarization over factual beliefs, and how knowledge resistance might be counteracted. This book will have a broad appeal to scholars and students interested in knowledge resistance, primarily within philosophy, psychology, media and communication, and political science, as well as journalists and policymakers.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRoutledge Studies in Media, Communication, and Politics
dc.subject.otheraffective polarization
dc.subject.otheranti-vaxx
dc.subject.otherattitudes
dc.subject.otherattitude-consistent information
dc.subject.otherattitude-discrepant Information
dc.subject.otherbeliefs attitudes knowledge
dc.subject.otherbiased information processing
dc.subject.othercitizens as co-producers of information
dc.subject.othercitizens as disseminators of information
dc.subject.othercitizens as media consumers
dc.subject.othercitizen knowledge motivated reasoning fact-checking
dc.subject.otherclimate change
dc.subject.otherclimate change denial
dc.subject.othercognition
dc.subject.othercognitive ability
dc.subject.othercognitive dissonance knowledge resistance
dc.subject.othercognitive dissonance political polarization
dc.subject.othercommunication
dc.subject.othercommunication knowledge resistance
dc.subject.otherconfirmation bias knowledge resistance
dc.subject.otherconfirmation bias political polarization
dc.subject.otherconspiracies
dc.subject.otherconspiracy theories
dc.subject.otherconspiracy theorists
dc.subject.othercontemporary high-choice media environments
dc.subject.othercontradictory information
dc.subject.othercounteracting knowledge resistance
dc.subject.othercredibility perceptions knowledge resistance
dc.subject.otherdeath of expertise
dc.subject.otherdenying expert authority
dc.titleKnowledge Resistance in High-Choice Information Environments
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003111474
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb
oapen.relation.isFundedBy2047b06c-7dbe-4fc1-b2e3-31680fd7cd70
oapen.relation.isbn9781000599121
oapen.relation.isbn9780367629250
oapen.relation.isbn9780367629281
oapen.relation.isbn9781003111474
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages328
oapen.grant.number[...]
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record