Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvon Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Anne
dc.contributor.authorHasson, Henna
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-25T09:33:38Z
dc.date.available2022-05-25T09:33:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/54685
dc.description.abstractIn designing, implementing, and evaluating organizational interventions, program logic plays a central role as it outlines the core components of the intervention and links them to both proximal and distal outcomes. Also, central in the design, implementation, and evaluation of organizational interventions is the engagement of stakeholders across the organization (employees, managers, and specialists). Concrete tools are lacking for stakeholders to be engaged in the design of interventions and in defining criteria that can guide evaluation. This chapter outlines a structured process – the cocreated program logic (COP) process – for how organizational stakeholders can be involved in defining intervention goals and activities and thus forming the program logic together with interventionists (researchers or consultants). The program logic can then be used to guide the evaluation of the organizational intervention. The authors present two cases illustrating how the COP process has been used in their reserach. The chapter ends with lessons learned.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.otherworkplace management, workplace interventions, mental health, management, line managers, stakeholders, organizational psychologyen_US
dc.titleChapter 2 Getting everyone on the same pageen_US
dc.title.alternativeCocreated program logic (COP)en_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781315410494-3en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookfb105d0c-da93-4d4b-8272-b8ff69514bb9en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy3453f066-3130-4e01-9e99-722c68890b18en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781138221413en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9781138221420en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages27en_US
oapen.remark.publicFunder name: Tord Heljeberg - Malardalen University
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record