Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFritz, Eleonora
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T12:15:45Z
dc.date.available2022-06-01T12:15:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifierONIX_20220601_9788855182362_366
dc.identifier.issn2704-5919
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56183
dc.description.abstractThe contribution aims to illustrate the results of the research conducted on the lexicon of the Petrarch-Boccaccio magisterium relationship. The research also made use of the comparison between Boccaccio's various masters: Petrarch on the one hand, Andalò del Negro and Leonzio Pilato on the other. The results of the research have shown the substantial difference of the Petrarchian magisterium compared to that of Leonzio or Andalò. Petrarch is a supreme teacher unlike the other two, considered by Boccaccio to be technical masters. Boccaccio in fact systematically attributes to Petrarch the noun preceptor, a very generic name: he is considered not only a teacher of literature but also of life. Boccaccio also expects from him a teaching that will lead him to an ethical conversion, as evidenced by the insistent presence of the lexicon pertaining to the moral sphere attributed to him.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.subject.otherBoccaccio
dc.subject.otherlexicon
dc.subject.othermaster
dc.subject.otherPetrarca
dc.subject.otherpreceptor
dc.titleChapter Il lessico del magistero nelle prose erudite di Giovanni Boccaccio
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-236-2.01
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9788855182362
oapen.series.number219
oapen.pages13
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record