Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLlano, Stephen M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T12:22:38Z
dc.date.available2022-06-01T12:22:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierONIX_20220601_9788855183291_582
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56397
dc.description.abstractA rhetorical model of the debate centered on the image of a labyrinth is more suitable than the metaphor of debate-as-game in describing the benefits of arguing in front of an audience. The labyrinth best expresses that proceeding by successive choices, coming and going, and sometimes retracing one's steps, typical of the debate activity. The basic thesis is that arguing is a continuous adaptation of one's speeches according to the audience that listens. In fact, in the labyrinth, what matters is not only arriving at the outcome - the exit or reaching the center of the structure - but the path you choose to get there is equally important. More than the definitive and winning argument, which rarely occurs in discussions, the labyrinth teaches us to recognise the plurality of approaches adopted when faced with an issue.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCommunication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments
dc.subject.otherArgumentation Theory
dc.subject.otherdebate
dc.subject.otherrhetoric
dc.titleChapter A Rhetorical Model of Debating
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.05
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9788855183291
oapen.series.number1
oapen.pages12
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record