Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCammelli, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorFioravanti, Chiara
dc.contributor.authorRomano, Francesco
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T12:28:58Z
dc.date.available2022-06-01T12:28:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierONIX_20220601_9788855183642_764
dc.identifier.issn2704-5846
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56580
dc.description.abstractPart of public opinion believes that Article 3 of the Italian Constitution should be reformulated by eliminating the word "race", because of its historical meanings. Some jurists disagree with this opinion believing that this presence is still justified by the need to fight possible discrimination or to protect minority rights. Biologists have also entered the debate, asserting that this word cannot be used to refer to human races because there’s no scientific basis for race. Cleared up any doubt about the origin of the term and the use that should be made of it, to contribute to today's debate, we have verified how this term was used in the language of law, using the terminological resources of the Institute of Legal Informatics and Judicial Systems (IGSG) – CNR databases.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProceedings e report
dc.subject.otherrace discrimination
dc.subject.otherminority rights
dc.subject.otherlanguage of law
dc.subject.otherterminological resources
dc.titleChapter Le risorse documentarie dell’Istituto di Teoria e Tecniche dell’Informazione Giuridica del CNR per un’analisi di termini giuridici rilevanti: il caso di studio della parola «razza»
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-364-2.06
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9788855183642
oapen.series.number129
oapen.pages12
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record