Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorBeljaars, Diana
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-22T12:13:45Z
dc.date.available2022-06-22T12:13:45Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57083
dc.description.abstractThe confusions live on as the neuropsychiatric sciences cannot answer all questions individuals with compulsive sensibilities may have. Chapter 2 outlines that current knowledge of Tourette’s-related compulsions is minimal, which, as a medicalised phenomenon, is mainly a result of the onto-epistemological structures that govern the neurosciences, psychiatry and psychology that study Tourette syndrome. It elaborates on how these structures create an impasse in the study of compulsions as such, but also as connected to the bodily surroundings. Furthermore, it problematizes the current limited involvement in research of people with Tourette’s who perform and experience the various circumstances of compulsions. Based on this critical review of these life sciences the argument in Chapter 2 identifies four transformations people’s understanding of compulsivity goes through, and sets out how a de-problematisation of the bodily action helps to expand research horizons.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.othercompulsive bodies, compulsive geographies, geographies of health, compulsive spacesen_US
dc.titleChapter 2 Complicationsen_US
dc.title.alternativeNeuropsychiatric rationalisationsen_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003109921-3en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bben_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook12fa6147-ca55-4342-a95a-dd5df7dd6b36en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBydf9f651c-412a-4a71-a6cb-fd8d32c3c0cben_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780367626082en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780367626099en_US
oapen.imprintRoutledgeen_US
oapen.pages22en_US
oapen.remark.publicFunder name: Geography Department - Swansea University
peerreview.anonymitySingle-anonymised
peerreview.idbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
peerreview.open.reviewNo
peerreview.publish.responsibilityPublisher
peerreview.review.stagePre-publication
peerreview.review.typeProposal
peerreview.reviewer.typeInternal editor
peerreview.reviewer.typeExternal peer reviewer
peerreview.titleProposal review
oapen.review.commentsTaylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record