What is Academic Freedom?
A Century of Debate, 1915–Present
dc.contributor.author | Gordon, Daniel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-20T09:10:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-20T09:10:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57554 | |
dc.description.abstract | This book explores the history of the debate, from 1915 to the present, about the meaning of academic freedom, particularly as concerns political activism on the college campus. The book introduces readers to the origins of the modern research university in the United States, the professionalization of the role of the university teacher, and the rise of alternative conceptions of academic freedom challenging the professional model and radicalizing the image of the university. Leading thinkers on the subject of academic freedom—Arthur Lovejoy, Angela Davis, Alexander Meiklejohn, Edward W. Said, among others—spring to life. What is the relationship between freedom of speech and academic freedom? Should communists be allowed to teach? What constitutes unacceptable political "indoctrination" in the classroom? What are the implications for academic freedom of creating Black Studies and Women's Studies departments? Do academic boycotts, such as those directed against Israel, violate the spirit of academic freedom? The book provides the context for these debates. Instead of opining as a judge, the author discloses the legal, philosophical, political, and semantic disagreements in each controversy. The book will appeal to readers across the social sciences and humanities with interests in scholarly freedom and academic life. | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | academic freedom;activism;gender;higher education;history;indoctrination;politicization;politics;purpose;radical politics;research university;rights;sociology;teaching;USA | en_US |
dc.title | What is Academic Freedom? | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | A Century of Debate, 1915–Present | en_US |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781003052685 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | en_US |
oapen.relation.isFundedBy | b818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780367511708 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9780367511715 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781000647693 | en_US |
oapen.collection | Knowledge Unlatched (KU) | en_US |
oapen.imprint | Routledge | en_US |
oapen.pages | 178 | en_US |
oapen.grant.number | 7079 | |
peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |