Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-01T09:18:07Z
dc.date.available2022-08-01T09:18:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/57674
dc.description.abstractIn this chapter, I examine three deontological objections to adblocking: the objection from property (according to which adblocking involves accessing another’s property without satisfying the conditions placed on such access by the owner), the objection from complicity (according to which, by blocking ads, consumers become complicit in wrongdoing of adblocking software providers), and the objection from freeriding (according to which adblocking consumers free-ride on other consumers who allow ads to be served). I argue that, though these objections plausibly establish the moral impermissibility of some instances of adblocking, they do not, even collectively, establish a blanket moral prohibition on adblocking, as it is currently done.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNR Intellectual property lawen_US
dc.subject.otherAdblocking, Piracy, Theft, Intellectual Property, Complicity, Extortion, Free-Ridingen_US
dc.titleChapter (When) Is Adblocking Wrong?en_US
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedByb9501915-cdee-4f2a-8030-9c0b187854b2en_US
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook5aef9031-6c4d-4408-9923-c5a99ee6524cen_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy178e65b9-dd53-4922-b85c-0aaa74fce079en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9780198857815en_US
oapen.collectionEuropean Research Council (ERC)en_US
oapen.pages21en_US
oapen.place.publicationOxforden_US
oapen.grant.number819757
oapen.grant.programProtMind


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record