Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSTEILA, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T20:06:19Z
dc.date.available2022-09-15T20:06:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierONIX_20220915_9788864539102_45
dc.identifier.issn2612-7679
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58249
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiblioteca di Studi Slavistici
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociologyen_US
dc.subject.otherempirio-criticism
dc.subject.otherMarxism
dc.subject.otheremotions
dc.subject.otherreligious thought
dc.subject.otherAnatolij Lunačarskij
dc.titleChapter Il ‘machismo’ russo: il caso di A.V. Lunačarskij
dc.typechapter
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageEmpirio-criticism had a huge impact in Russia, where the works of Ernst Mach and Richard Avenarius works were avidly translated and discussed, while the question of whether or not their ideas could be combined with Marxism provoked many disputes within the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party or RSDRP (Rossijskaja social-demokratičeskaja rabočaja partija). Anatolij Lunačarskij, who attended Avenarius’s classes and seminars in Zurich, particularly appreciated the opportunity to blend critical evaluation, emotion, and objective knowledge. In this period prior to the Revolution, Lunačarskij developed a sort of ‘religious’ Marxism, full of hope and enthusiasm for a final human conquest of nature, views that he continued to hold into Soviet times.
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-6453-910-2.36
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9788864539102
oapen.series.number43
oapen.pages9
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record