Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeil, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T16:06:29Z
dc.date.available2022-12-22T16:06:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierONIX_20221222_9788855186230_45
dc.identifier.issn2704-6079
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/60383
dc.description.abstractThe long-running jurisdictional dispute between the patriarchs of Aquileia and Grado entered a period of particular activity in the 820s, culminating in a judicial decision in Aquileia’s favor at the Council of Mantua in 827. This council and its consequences offer fertile ground for exploring the ways that texts figured in ecclesiastical conflicts in ninth-century Italy. Recent work has shed light on the role hagiographical texts played in this dispute. This chapter examines another “textual” dimension: the role of canons and canon-law norms in arguments and decisions, in the “courtroom” and beyond. The chapter concludes with brief discussion of a different case, from Lucca, that shows with particular clarity the close connection that could exist between canon law in the manuscripts and in legal practice.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReti Medievali E-Book
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH Historyen_US
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ages
dc.subject.other9th century
dc.subject.otherNorth-Eastern Italy
dc.subject.otherMantua
dc.subject.otherAquileia-Grado
dc.subject.otherMaxentius
dc.subject.othercanon law
dc.subject.otherlegal practice
dc.titleChapter Canons, books of canons, and ecclesiastical judgments in Carolingian Italy: the Council of Mantua, 827
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-623-0.06
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9788855186230
oapen.series.number41
oapen.pages20
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record