Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMéndez Baiges, Maite
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T16:07:49Z
dc.date.available2022-12-22T16:07:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierONIX_20221222_9788855186568_89
dc.identifier.issn2704-5919
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/60427
dc.description.abstractIn the 1960s and 1970s this formalist version seen in the previous chapter began to show signs of fatigue. Some critics and art historians began to show interest in the personages on stage in Les Demoiselles. Early on John Nash linked the damsel squatting at lower right of the canvas with the myth of Medusa. Leo Steinberg immediately formulated a series of questions that constituted a direct attack against the formalist version. Why should we examine a painting that presented five naked prostitutes, all gazing fixedly at the viewer, merely from the formalist perspective? The time had come to take into account the content of the painting and consequently all of modern art which had been restricted by the prevailing formalism. This chapter tells how the formalist arguments were refuted and cleared the way for the iconological studies that placed the powerful sexual content in the foreground. The person mainly responsible for this was Leo Steinberg who sparked off an authentic revolution on the way to deal with this work and Modernism as a whole.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::A The Artsen_US
dc.subject.otherModernism
dc.subject.otherDemoislles d'Avignon
dc.subject.otherJohn Nash
dc.subject.otherLeo Steinberg
dc.titleChapter Other Criteria. Problematic Nudes
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-656-8.05
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9788855186568
oapen.series.number242
oapen.pages12
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record